PUBLIC VAULT UFO ARCHIVE KR
INDEX

  1. -7-

    -7-

    -7-

  2. 신시내티 페인트 사건 -- 유사 현상? 1954년 9월 11일 신시내티 주민들도 비슷한 경험을 했다. 앨버트 알게이어는 퇴근 후 집에 돌아와 보니 2층 집의 밝은 노란색 테두리가 "색이 바랜 갈색, 거의 검은색"으로 얼룩져 있었다. 얼룩은 단단한 상단 페인트 층을 벗겨내지 않고도 문질러 지워졌다. 마치 누군가 토치를 사용한 것 같았고, 어떤 곳에서는 얼룩이 더러운 갈색 물줄기처럼 나타났다. 알게이어는 전날 밤에는 얼룩이 없었다고 확신했다. 이웃인 하워드 메이도 마찬가지였다. 그의 집도 노란색으로 칠해져 있었고, 길 건너편의 다른 집에도 얼룩이 나타났다.

    THE CINCINNATI PAINT INCIDENT -- A PARALLEL PHENOMENON? Residents in Cincinnati, Sept. 11, '54 had similar experiences. One Albert Allgeyer came home from work to find the bright yellow trim on his two-story house stained to a "washed-out brown, almost black color." The stains would rub off, without taking the hard top coat of paint, too. It looked like someone had used a blow-torch, and in some places the stains appeared in dirty brown rivulets. Allgeyer was certain that the stains weren't there the night before. So was Howard May, neighbor, who received similar treatment. His house trimmed in yellow too, as is another house across the street where stains appeared.

    THE CINCINNATI PAINT INCIDENT -- A PARALLEL PHENOMENON? Residents in Cincinnati, Sept. 11, '54 had similar experiences. One Albert Allgeyer came home from work to find the bright yellow trim on his two-story house stained to a "washed-out brown, almost black color." The stains would rub off, without taking the hard top coat of paint, too. It looked like someone had used a blow-torch, and in some places the stains appeared in dirty brown rivulets. Allgeyer was certain that the stains weren't there the night before. So was Howard May, neighbor, who received similar treatment. His house trimmed in yellow too, as is another house across the street where stains appeared.

  3. 9월 22일, 나는 알게이어와 다시 이야기했고 신시내티 대학교의 케터링 연구소가 공기 샘플과 영향을 받은 페인트 샘플을 채취했다는 것을 알게 되었다. 휴즈 박사는 이 미스터리가 특정 페인트의 납을 공격할 수 있는 황화수소의 화학 반응으로 인해 발생했다고 설명했다. 연구소는 이 화학 물질이 알게이어의 집 근처를 흐르는 밀크릭 계곡에서 나왔을 가능성이 높으며, 이후 이 지역의 다른 집에도 영향을 미쳤다고 주장했다. 알게이어를 검사한 프록터 앤드 갬블의 의사는 언급된 화학 물질이 사람에게 해롭지 않다고 말했지만, 알게이어는 사건 발생 5일 후 양손과 눈꺼풀이 극심하게 부어오른다고 호소했다. 일종의 알레르기(두드러기는 아님)로 묘사되었지만, 그들은 아무런 설명을 제공하지 못했다.

    On Sept. 22, I talked with Allgeyer again and learned that the Kettering Lab at University of Cincinnati had taken air samples as well as specimens of the af- fected paint. A Dr. Hughes explained that the mystery was caused by the chemi- cal reaction of hydrogen sulphide which could attack the lead in certain paints. The Lab averred that the chemical probably emanated from the Millcreek Valley which runs near Allgeyer's home, and which has since affected other homes in the area. Although a Proctor and Gamble doctor who examined Allgeyer told him that the chemical mentioned is not injurious to people, Allgeyer, five days after the incident complained of extreme swelling of both hands and eye lids. Described as some kind of allergy -- not hives, they offered no explanation.

    On Sept. 22, I talked with Allgeyer again and learned that the Kettering Lab at University of Cincinnati had taken air samples as well as specimens of the af- fected paint. A Dr. Hughes explained that the mystery was caused by the chemi- cal reaction of hydrogen sulphide which could attack the lead in certain paints. The Lab averred that the chemical probably emanated from the Millcreek Valley which runs near Allgeyer's home, and which has since affected other homes in the area. Although a Proctor and Gamble doctor who examined Allgeyer told him that the chemical mentioned is not injurious to people, Allgeyer, five days after the incident complained of extreme swelling of both hands and eye lids. Described as some kind of allergy -- not hives, they offered no explanation.

  4. 편집자 주: 다른 흔한 미스터리들, 즉, 구멍 난 앞유리, 금속 알갱이, 이상한 재 퇴적물을 기억하며, 나는 뉴욕 버팔로의 에드워드 S. 슐츠가 쓴 최근 기사를 참고했다. 이 기사는 B.S.R.A.의 1954년 5월-6월호 라운드 로빈에 실린 "점점 증가하는 앞유리 손상 현상"이라는 제목이었다. 이 기사에서 슐츠는 그럴듯하고 도발적인 이론들을 제시한다... 그리고 이러한 현상에 대한 가능한 답을 제시한다. Meade Layne, Director, 3524 Adams Ave., San Diego 16, California로 편지를 보내십시오.

    Editor's Note: Remembering other ubiquitous mysteries, viz., pitted wind- shields, metallic pellets, curious ash deposits, I referred to a recent article written by Edward S. Schultz, of Buffalo, N.Y. entitled, "The Growing Wind- shield Damage Phenomenon," which appeared in B.S.R.A.'s May-June, 1954 issue of Round Robin. In this, Schultz offers plausible and provocative theories ... and the possible answer to these phenomena. Write Meade Layne, Direc- tor, 3524 Adams Ave., San Diego 16, California.

    Editor's Note: Remembering other ubiquitous mysteries, viz., pitted wind- shields, metallic pellets, curious ash deposits, I referred to a recent article written by Edward S. Schultz, of Buffalo, N.Y. entitled, "The Growing Wind- shield Damage Phenomenon," which appeared in B.S.R.A.'s May-June, 1954 issue of Round Robin. In this, Schultz offers plausible and provocative theories ... and the possible answer to these phenomena. Write Meade Layne, Direc- tor, 3524 Adams Ave., San Diego 16, California.

  5. 사례 파일 검토: 모든 훌륭한 자료를 사용할 공간이 없다. 미국, 유럽, 호주에서의 목격은 계속되고 있으며 뉴스레터의 다음 호에 사용될 것이다.

    CASE FILE REVIEW: Space does not permit the use of all the excellent ma- terial received. Sightings in the U.S., Europe and Australia are continuing and will be used in forthcoming issues of the Newsletter.

    CASE FILE REVIEW: Space does not permit the use of all the excellent ma- terial received. Sightings in the U.S., Europe and Australia are continuing and will be used in forthcoming issues of the Newsletter.

  6. C-22, 록포드, 일리노이주 . . . 1954년 9월 5일) 여러 차례 그랬듯이, 아마추어 천문학자 피터 바트쿠스와 시어도어 맥콜름은 망원경으로 달을 관찰하고 있었다. 밤 10시 35분부터 11시 15분 사이에 바트쿠스는 다음과 같이 썼다: "나는 내가 경험했던 가장 특이한 현상을 목격했다." 바트쿠스는 계속해서 다음과 같이 말했다: "달은 나의 6인치 카세그레인 반사 망원경을 보조 거울을 사용하여 관찰되었다. 이 설정의 총 초점 거리는 100인치가 넘고, 150배 및 200배 접안렌즈를 사용하여 빛 손실을 최소화하면서 엄청난 배율을 얻었다. 달은 초승달이었고 지름은 29피트 30인치였다. 우리는 마레 훔볼트티아눔 지역 북쪽에서 상승하는 구형 물체를 보았다. 빛나거나 밝지는 않았지만, 행성의 둔한 반사광처럼 보였다. 그 크기는 피티스쿠스 또는 블라코 분화구의 지름 정도라고 추정했다. 11시 15분에 사라질 때까지 약 40분 동안 29피트 30인치 이상의 호를 이동했다. 우리는 망원경을 이동시키고 접안렌즈를 변경하여 하늘이나 망원경의 대기 회절 가능성을 확인했다. 달이 시속 1081마일로 하강하고 있었기 때문에 그 물체는 동력체였음에 틀림없다. 그 물체는 상승하고 있었고 진정한 궤도를 따르지 않았다. 그것은 분명히 우주에 있었고, 달과 같은 시야에 있거나 달 근처에 있었다."

    C-22, Rockford, Ill. . . . 9/5/54) As they had done on many occasions, amateur astronomers, Peter Bartkus and Theodore McColm, were watching the moon through a telescope. Between the hours of 10:35 and 11:15 P.M., Bartkus writes: "I observed the most unusual phenomena I have ever had the experi- ence of witnessing." Bartkus continues: "The moon was observed through my 6" cassigranian reflector telescope using a secondary mirror. The total focal length for this setup is over 100", and with the use of 150 and 200 power occu- lars we got tremendous power with the least loss of light. The moon was in the first quarter and its diameter was 29 feet, 30 inches. We saw a spherical object ascending from the northern section off Mare Humboldtianum area. It was not glowing or brilliant, but seemed more like a dull reflected light of a planet. Its size we estimated at about the diameter of craters Pitiscus or Vlaco. At the time it disappeared at 11:15, it had travelled more than the 29' 30" of arc in about 40 minutes. We checked out the possibility of atmosphere diffraction in the sky or the scope by traversing the scope, and by changing the occulars. The object must have been a powered body because as the moon was descending at 1081 mph, the object was ascending and not following a true orbit. It was definitely in space, and in the same field as the moon, or near the moon."

    C-22, Rockford, Ill. . . . 9/5/54) As they had done on many occasions, amateur astronomers, Peter Bartkus and Theodore McColm, were watching the moon through a telescope. Between the hours of 10:35 and 11:15 P.M., Bartkus writes: "I observed the most unusual phenomena I have ever had the experi- ence of witnessing." Bartkus continues: "The moon was observed through my 6" cassigranian reflector telescope using a secondary mirror. The total focal length for this setup is over 100", and with the use of 150 and 200 power occu- lars we got tremendous power with the least loss of light. The moon was in the first quarter and its diameter was 29 feet, 30 inches. We saw a spherical object ascending from the northern section off Mare Humboldtianum area. It was not glowing or brilliant, but seemed more like a dull reflected light of a planet. Its size we estimated at about the diameter of craters Pitiscus or Vlaco. At the time it disappeared at 11:15, it had travelled more than the 29' 30" of arc in about 40 minutes. We checked out the possibility of atmosphere diffraction in the sky or the scope by traversing the scope, and by changing the occulars. The object must have been a powered body because as the moon was descending at 1081 mph, the object was ascending and not following a true orbit. It was definitely in space, and in the same field as the moon, or near the moon."