PUBLIC VAULT UFO ARCHIVE KR
INDEX

  1. 작성자

    by

    by

  2. 이 기사가 인쇄되어 나오기 전에, 보안 검토 및 승인을 위해 국방부 관련 당국에 제출되었을 것입니다. 왜냐고요? 미 육군 규정에 따라, 저자는 내용의 정확성, 적절성 및 보안 준수 여부를 검토받을 의무가 있기 때문입니다. 그리고 이 과정은 이 기사뿐만 아니라 그가 미확인 비행 물체의 군사적 측면에 대해 쓸 수 있는 다른 어떤 기사에도 적용됩니다. 육군부 민간인으로 근무하는 동안, 저는 지난 6년 동안 UFO 연구에서 연방 정부의 역할에 대한 비공식적인 비판을 써왔습니다. 저는 그러한 논란이 많은 주제에 대해 글을 쓰는 것에 대한 명백한 반대(예: "밥 주는 손을 물다")에 직면하고 견뎌냈으며, 저를 비난하는 사람들에게 이렇게 말할 수밖에 없습니다. "누군가는 해야 합니다. 누군가는 UFO 검열관들에게 도전해야 합니다. 그들이 존재한다고 가정하면 말이죠." 그들의 존재에 대한 증거는 이전에 승인된 제 원고 중 최소 두 편과 검토-승인 장애물을 넘지 못한 한 편에 의해 제시되었습니다. 제가 믿는 바를 자유롭게 말하는 것이 얼마나 더 오래 가능할지는 모르겠습니다.

    Before you see this article in print, it will have been submitted to appropriate Defense Department authori- ties for security review and clearance. Why? Because, under U. S. Army regulations, its author is in duty bound to have its contents examined for adherence to accuracy, propriety, and security. And the process applies not just to this article, but to any others he might write on the military aspect of Unidentified Flying Objects. While employed as a Department of the Army civilian, I have been writing for the past six years unofficial critiques of the Federal Government's role in UFO research. I have confronted and withstood the obvious objections to my writing on such a controversial subject (e.g., "biting the hand that feeds you"), and I can only say to my detractors: "Someone must do it. Someone must challenge the UFO censors, assuming they exist." Proof of their existence has been offered by at least two of my previously cleared manuscripts and by one that failed to hurdle the review-clearance obstacle. As to exactly how much longer I can speak out freely for what I believe without bringing

    Before you see this article in print, it will have been submitted to appropriate Defense Department authori- ties for security review and clearance. Why? Because, under U. S. Army regulations, its author is in duty bound to have its contents examined for adherence to accuracy, propriety, and security. And the process applies not just to this article, but to any others he might write on the military aspect of Unidentified Flying Objects. While employed as a Department of the Army civilian, I have been writing for the past six years unofficial critiques of the Federal Government's role in UFO research. I have confronted and withstood the obvious objections to my writing on such a controversial subject (e.g., "biting the hand that feeds you"), and I can only say to my detractors: "Someone must do it. Someone must challenge the UFO censors, assuming they exist." Proof of their existence has been offered by at least two of my previously cleared manuscripts and by one that failed to hurdle the review-clearance obstacle. As to exactly how much longer I can speak out freely for what I believe without bringing

  3. 257

    257

    257