PUBLIC VAULT UFO ARCHIVE KR
INDEX

  1. 119 사람들이 알게 되어야 할 그리고 접촉들. 당신의 독자들이 바로 이 순간 형제들의 생각에 익숙해지고 그가 그들과 이야기할 기회를 갖게 된다면 그때 당신은 G.A. 로널드와의 나의 접촉에 대해 이야기할 수 있습니다. 나는 당신에게 말할 수 없습니다. 당신은 당신 자신의 판단을 사용해야 합니다. 언제든지 그것을 사용하고 싶다면 그렇게 하십시오. 나는 사람들을 마주하는 것을 두려워하지 않습니다. 그것과 함께 오는 것을, 매들린도 마찬가지입니다. 인용 끝.

    119 that the people should become aware of and contacts. When your readers acquainted with the idea of the brothers at this very moment and that every chance to talk to them if he becomes then you may talk about my contacts with G.A. Ronald, I cannot tell you you must use your own judgement. When ever you feel to use it then go so. I am not afraid to face the people comes with it, neither is Madeleine. UNQUOTE.

    119 that the people should become aware of and contacts. When your readers acquainted with the idea of the brothers at this very moment and that every chance to talk to them if he becomes then you may talk about my contacts with G.A. Ronald, I cannot tell you you must use your own judgement. When ever you feel to use it then go so. I am not afraid to face the people comes with it, neither is Madeleine. UNQUOTE.

  2. 그것이 조용한 접촉들의 이야기입니다. 왜 제가 이 모든 것을 당신에게 말했습니까? 왜냐하면 이 글을 읽는 사람들은 프레드와 잉그리드 스텍클링, 그리고 그 이후를 느낄 것이기 때문입니다.

    That is the story of the Quiet Contacts. Why have I told you all this? Because those who read these words will feel of Fred and Ingrid Steckling, and of after.

    That is the story of the Quiet Contacts. Why have I told you all this? Because those who read these words will feel of Fred and Ingrid Steckling, and of after.

  3. 회의론자들은 항상 사람들에 대해 이야기합니다. 돈벌이". 아마 그들은 스텍클링 부부나 매들린에 대해서는 옳을 것입니다. 빨리 돈을 벌지만, 그들은 아담스키가 그들에게 맡긴 일을 꾸준함과 용기로 하고 있습니다. 용기로. 이것으로부터 얻는 교훈은 무엇입니까? 첫째, 당신은 그들의 이야기가 진실인지 아닌지에 대해 스스로 판단할 것입니다. - 조지 아담스키가 자주 말했듯이: "나는 당신을 설득하기 위해 여기에 있는 것이 아닙니다. - 단지 당신에게 말하기 위해 여기에 있습니다." 둘째, - 당신은 다시 한번 사건의 흐름 속에서 당신을 위해 그려진 그림을 보라고 초대받습니다. 조지 아담스키는 그의 이야기와 그의 영화를 당국을 포함한 누구에게나 가져갔고 - 모든 비판과 전문가 분석에 직면할 준비가 되어 있었습니다. 매들린 로퍼는 그녀의 정원 위로 비행접시의 클로즈업 사진을 찍을 수 있었습니다. 이것은 형제들과 함께 준비되었고, 그녀는 G.A.와 함께 바로 그날 전국 네트워크에 직면할 것으로 예상되었습니다. - 그녀는 국회의사당의 관리들을 만났습니다. 그녀는 형제들을 만났습니다. 프레드 스텍클링은 NASA의 사진 전문가들과 국방부 사람들에게 깊은 인상을 준 독특한 영화를 찍었습니다. 그는 형제들을 만났습니다. 이 모든 것이 항상 우연의 일치일 수 있을까요? 그들이 항상 독특하고 인상적인 증거를 위조할 수 있을까요? 이 시점에서 저는 조지 아담스키가 1959년 세계 여행 중이었을 때, 호주와 뉴질랜드의 많은 별개의 증인들이 G.A.가 강연했던 바로 그 도시와 마을들 위로 접시들의 활동과 편대를 보고했다고 덧붙이고 싶습니다. 이 모든 것은 기록을 위한 것입니다. 프레드 스텍클링이 세상의 의미를 담은 간단한 말로 썼듯이: 중요한 것은 일이다 - 우리가 아니다.

    The sceptics talk always of people buck". Maybe they are right about about the Stecklings or Madeleine. money fast, but they are doing the Adamski left them to do, with steadiness and cou- rage. What is the lesson from this? First, you will make up your own minds as to the truth of their stories, - as George Adamski said so often: "I'm not here to convince you, - just to tell you." Second, - you are invited to look again picture which is painted for you in the of events. GEORGE ADAMSKI took his story and his films to ANYONE - including authority - and was prepared to face all criticism and expert analysis. MADELEINE ROEFFER was enabled to take close- up shots of a flying saucer over her garden. This was arranged with the Brothers, and she was expect- ed, with G.A.'s, on the very same day, to face the nation-wide networks, - she has faced the officials on Capitol Hill. She has met the Brothers. FRED STECKLING has taken a unique movie-film which has impressed NASA's photographic experts and the men at the Pentagon. He has met the Brothers. Can it be CO-INCIDENCE all the time? Can they FAKE unique and impressive evidence ALL THE TIME? At this point I might add that whilst George Adam- ski was on his 1959 world-tour, many separate witn- esses in Australia and New Zealand reported activit- ies and formations of saucers over some of the very cities and towns where G.A. lectured. All this is for the record. As Fred Steckling wrote in simple words which hold a world of meaning: IMPORTANT IS THE WORK - NOT US.

    The sceptics talk always of people buck". Maybe they are right about about the Stecklings or Madeleine. money fast, but they are doing the Adamski left them to do, with steadiness and cou- rage. What is the lesson from this? First, you will make up your own minds as to the truth of their stories, - as George Adamski said so often: "I'm not here to convince you, - just to tell you." Second, - you are invited to look again picture which is painted for you in the of events. GEORGE ADAMSKI took his story and his films to ANYONE - including authority - and was prepared to face all criticism and expert analysis. MADELEINE ROEFFER was enabled to take close- up shots of a flying saucer over her garden. This was arranged with the Brothers, and she was expect- ed, with G.A.'s, on the very same day, to face the nation-wide networks, - she has faced the officials on Capitol Hill. She has met the Brothers. FRED STECKLING has taken a unique movie-film which has impressed NASA's photographic experts and the men at the Pentagon. He has met the Brothers. Can it be CO-INCIDENCE all the time? Can they FAKE unique and impressive evidence ALL THE TIME? At this point I might add that whilst George Adam- ski was on his 1959 world-tour, many separate witn- esses in Australia and New Zealand reported activit- ies and formations of saucers over some of the very cities and towns where G.A. lectured. All this is for the record. As Fred Steckling wrote in simple words which hold a world of meaning: IMPORTANT IS THE WORK - NOT US.

  4. UFO-사진

    UFO-PICTURES

    UFO-PICTURES