PUBLIC VAULT UFO ARCHIVE KR
INDEX

  1. 배경: 1952년 8월-9월은 착륙했거나 착륙하는 것으로 보이는 비행접시의 전례 없는 수로 인해 현재까지 비행접시 보고서에 있어 아마도 가장 흥미로운 시기였을 것입니다. 보고서가 접수된 광범위하게 분리된 지역은 보고서가 진짜일 가능성을 뒷받침하며, 보고서가 매우 흥미롭고 중요할 가능성이 있으므로, 각 호에는 이 특집 섹션에서 논의될 하나 이상의 그러한 보고서가 포함될 것입니다. 이 호는 PITTSBURG, KANSAS 보고서 스크랩과 원본 그림을 재인쇄합니다.

    BACKGROUND: The August-September 1952 period was probably the most interesting time for saucer reports to date, due to the unprecedented number of saucers that appeared landing or landed. The widely separ- ated areas that reports came from backs the possibility they were genuine, and the reports are of such interest as well as possible importance, that each issue will have one or more such reports discussed in this feature section. This issue reprints the PITTSBURG, KANSAS report clipping and original drawing.

    BACKGROUND: The August-September 1952 period was probably the most interesting time for saucer reports to date, due to the unprecedented number of saucers that appeared landing or landed. The widely separ- ated areas that reports came from backs the possibility they were genuine, and the reports are of such interest as well as possible importance, that each issue will have one or more such reports discussed in this feature section. This issue reprints the PITTSBURG, KANSAS report clipping and original drawing.

  2. 진위: 목격은 단 한 사람에 의해 이루어졌으므로, 여러 명의 신뢰할 수 있는 관찰자들의 무게를 가지지 않습니다. 지역 신문에 따르면, 스콰이어스는 일반적으로 겸손하고 공상에 빠지지 않는 사람으로 알려져 있었습니다.

    AUTHENTICITY: The sighting was made by only 1 person, and therefore does not have the weight of several reputable observers. According to local newspapers, Squyres was generally known as modest, not given to flights of fancy.

    AUTHENTICITY: The sighting was made by only 1 person, and therefore does not have the weight of several reputable observers. According to local newspapers, Squyres was generally known as modest, not given to flights of fancy.

  3. 키호는 최근 저서에서 공군이 그의 보고서에 깊은 인상을 받았고, 상당히 신뢰할 수 있다고 여겼다고 진술했습니다. 스콰이어스를 인터뷰한 다른 작가는 그가 읽거나 쓸 줄 모르고 교육 수준이 높지 않았다고 저에게 알려주었으며, 따라서 그가 다른 보고서를 읽었거나 그렇게 상세한 속임수를 꾸밀 만한 독서 배경을 가졌을 가능성은 낮아 보입니다.

    In his recent book, Keyhoe stated Air Force was impressed by his report, and considered it quite reliable. Another writer who inter- viewed Squyres, informs me he also cannot read nor write, and was not too well educated, and it thus seems unlikely he could have read anothe report or had a reading background to have formed so detailed a hoax.

    In his recent book, Keyhoe stated Air Force was impressed by his report, and considered it quite reliable. Another writer who inter- viewed Squyres, informs me he also cannot read nor write, and was not too well educated, and it thus seems unlikely he could have read anothe report or had a reading background to have formed so detailed a hoax.

  4. 다른 보고서와의 유사점: (1) 이 물체는 과거에 보고된 특징 없는 수많은 비행접시와는 닮지 않았습니다. 약간 닮은 유일한 다른 보고서는 1948년 7월 앨라배마에서 있었던 차일스-휘티드 보고서입니다. 그러나 이것은 위아래에 큰 투명 창문이 있었고, 로켓선과 같은 모양이었습니다.

    SIMILARITIES TO OTHER REPORTS: (1) This object does not resemble the great mass of featureless saucers reported in the past. The only other report it slightly resembles is the Chiles-Whitted report of July 1948 from Alabama. However, this had large transparent windows on top and bottom, and was rocketship-like in shape.

    SIMILARITIES TO OTHER REPORTS: (1) This object does not resemble the great mass of featureless saucers reported in the past. The only other report it slightly resembles is the Chiles-Whitted report of July 1948 from Alabama. However, this had large transparent windows on top and bottom, and was rocketship-like in shape.

  5. (2) 우리는 다시 물체를 따라 회전하는 확장부를 가지고 있는데, 이는 검토 #7, 14페이지와 15페이지에 언급된 2개의 물체와 유사합니다. 그러나 이 확장부들은 Maxatawney 및 Garden City 보고서의 모양과는 다시 다릅니다.

    (2) We again have the rotating extensions along the object, similar to 2 Object mentioned in review #7, page 14 and 15. These extensions, however are again dissimilar in shape from the Maxatawney and Garden City reports.

    (2) We again have the rotating extensions along the object, similar to 2 Object mentioned in review #7, page 14 and 15. These extensions, however are again dissimilar in shape from the Maxatawney and Garden City reports.

  6. (3) 밝은 파란색으로 빛나는 창문은 1948년 차일스 보고서와 상당히 유사합니다. 이는 비행접시 보고서에서 거의 언급되지 않습니다. 흥미로운 점은 그러한 밝은 조명이 어두운 조명의 화성(주로 붉은 스펙트럼의 빛을 가짐)에서 온 것이 아니라, 빛나는 별(베가와 같은)이나 태양에 가까운 행성(금성과 같은)에서 온 우주선에 의해 사용될 것이라는 점입니다. 이는 또한 화성 접근 시 비행접시의 급격한 증가와도 상충되며, 화성이 그들의 실제 기원이 아니라 그들을 위한 우주 정거장일 수 있음을 의미할 수 있습니다.

    (3) The bright blue glowing windows are quite similar to the 1948 Chiles report; this is rarely mentioned in any saucer report. Of some interest is that such bright lighting would be used by a spaceship from a luminous star, (like Vega), or from a planet close to the sun (like Venus), rather than from a dimly lighted planet like Mars, whose light is primarily of the red spectrum. This also conflicts with sharp saucer increases during Mars approaches, and may mean Mars is a space station for them, rather than as their real origin.

    (3) The bright blue glowing windows are quite similar to the 1948 Chiles report; this is rarely mentioned in any saucer report. Of some interest is that such bright lighting would be used by a spaceship from a luminous star, (like Vega), or from a planet close to the sun (like Venus), rather than from a dimly lighted planet like Mars, whose light is primarily of the red spectrum. This also conflicts with sharp saucer increases during Mars approaches, and may mean Mars is a space station for them, rather than as their real origin.

  7. (4) "인간"의 관찰은 1947년 이후 거의 보고되지 않은 새로운 특징입니다. 스콰이어스가 창문의 빛이 눈부셨고 100피트 이상 가까이 가지 않았다고 말했으므로, 그가 인간과 유사한 형태를 보았을 가능성이 더 높습니다. 현재의 모든 데이터와 논리는 비행접시에 비인간만이 있다는 것을 가리킵니다.

    (4) The observation of a "human being" is a new feature, rarely reported since 1947. Since Squyres said light in window was glaring and he was not much closer than 100 feet, it is more probable he saw a human-like form. All present data and logic points to only non-humans in saucers.

    (4) The observation of a "human being" is a new feature, rarely reported since 1947. Since Squyres said light in window was glaring and he was not much closer than 100 feet, it is more probable he saw a human-like form. All present data and logic points to only non-humans in saucers.

  8. (5) 공회전하는 엔진의 고동 소리는 매우 특이하며, 거의 보고되지 않습니다. 일반적인 무음 엔진이 초음속으로 비행접시를 작동시키는 동안, 이 소리는 움직이는 프로펠러에만 동력을 공급할 가능성이 있습니다. 물체의 수직 상승은 알려진 모든 미군 항공기를 완전히 배제합니다.

    (5) The throbbing sound of idling motors is very unusual, rarely is reported. It is possible they power only moving propellors, while usual noiseless engine operates saucer at supersonic speeds. The vertical rise of the object completely rules out any known US aircraft.

    (5) The throbbing sound of idling motors is very unusual, rarely is reported. It is possible they power only moving propellors, while usual noiseless engine operates saucer at supersonic speeds. The vertical rise of the object completely rules out any known US aircraft.

  9. 결론: 이 보고서는 중요한 1952년 8월-9월 기간의 모든 착륙 보고서 중 가장 신뢰할 수 있는 것으로 보입니다. 휴머노이드 묘사 또한 최근 보고서에서 가장 신뢰할 수 있는 것으로 저희는 믿습니다.

    CONCLUSION: This report appears to be most authentic of all landing reports for important Aug-Sept. 1952 period. The humanoid descriptions also appears the most authentic made in recent reports, to our belief.

    CONCLUSION: This report appears to be most authentic of all landing reports for important Aug-Sept. 1952 period. The humanoid descriptions also appears the most authentic made in recent reports, to our belief.