-
136 UFO 접촉
136 ufo contact
136 ufo contact
-
무게 분배 및 표면 조작에 관련된 원리, 즉 혁신적인 호버크라프트를 생산하는 전문 엔지니어들. "내 독자들 중 일부는 이러한 과거 평가에서 나보다 앞서 있었을 것이고, 의심할 여지 없이 나의 다음 의도를 예상했을 것이다. 그러나 다른 사람들은 다음 상관관계가 이루어져야 한다는 것에 약간 참을성이 없을 것이다. 하지만 나는 과학이 편향되어서는 안 된다는 것을 강조해야 한다. 과학은 사실이며, 나는 그것을 있는 그대로 두려고 매우 노력한다. 그러므로 나는 독자들도 그러하기를 진심으로 바란다. 나는 매우 비난받는 사람일 수도 있는 사람에게 더 진실한 빛을 비추는 데 도움이 되기를 바라는 증거를 위해 의도적으로 다음 제목을 선택했다." 인용 끝. 그렇다, "매우 비난받는 사람"은 조지 아담스키이다. 12년 전 레너드 G. 크램프는 스티븐 다비셔의 "코니스톤" 비행접시가 저자가 촬영한 대로 아담스키의 고전적인 "정찰선"과 모양과 비율이 동일하다는 것을 보여주는 정사영을 제작했다. 오늘날, 그의 책 "직소 퍼즐 조각"에서 크램프 씨는 수백 건의 보고된 비행접시 목격 사례 분석 결과 순전히 공학적 원리를 따르고, 기동 및 비행 패턴에 대한 상세한 설명을 통해 방문하는 "비행접시"에 대한 모든 면에서 이상적인 형태에 도달하는 방법을 보여주는 매우 기술적인 성격의 놀라운 증거를 제시한다. 저자의 점진적인 선 그림과 사진을 거쳐 그가 마침내 만들어낸 비행접시는 아담스키의 정찰선이다. 그의 결론 장에서 저자는 아담스키가 그의 논란이 많은 책에서 제공한 공학 데이터의 세부 사항을 인용할 뿐만 아니라, 크램프 씨는 이 마지막 장을 쓸 때까지 아담스키의 "우주선 내부"를 완전히 읽지 않았다고 고백한다! 아마도 이 뒤늦은 고백에 대한 일부 독자들의 회의론을 깨달았을 크램프 씨는 아담스키가 정찰선에서 여행했다고 주장하는 내용에 대한 그 책에 설명된 요점들을 계속해서 설명하며, 그 결과 그의 (크램프의) 과학적으로 도출된 데이터가 놀라운 확증을 얻는다! "이 시점에서 나는 많은 아담스키 회의론자들이 믿을 수 없다는 한숨을 쉬는 것을 거의 들을 수 있다. 내가 이런 종류의 반기술적인 작업에 그러한 자료를 포함시킬 용기가 있다는 것을 거의 믿지 못할 것이다." 인용 끝. 많은 상세한 국제 목격 보고서를 과학적으로 분석하고, "비행접시"의 기동 및 비행의 모든 측면에 대해 그가 수행한 집중적인 연구를 보여주는 그 자신의 촬영된 실험과 수십 개의 정교하게 실행된 선 그림이 함께 제공되는 레너드 크램프는 열린 마음을 가진 모든 사람들에게 생각할 거리를 제공한다. 여기서, 우리가 편향되었든 편향되지 않았든 간에, 우리는
the principles involved in weight-distri- bution and surface manipulation, i.e. expert engineers producing the revolutionary Hovercraft. "Some of my readers will have been ahead of me in these past assessments and no doubt will have anticipated my next intention. Yet others will be a trifle impatient that the following correlation should be made. But I must stress that science is not to be biased, science is fact, and I try very hard to leave it as it is. Therefore I am sincerely hopeful that the reader will be, too. I have purposely chosen the following title for the evidence which I hope may help shed some truer light on one who may be a very maligned man." UNQUOTE. Yes, the "very maligned man" is George Adamski. 12 years ago Leonard G. Cramp produced the orthographic projections which showed Stephen Darbishire's "Coniston" saucer, as photo- graphed by the author, was identical in shape and proportion to Adamski's classic "scout-craft". Today, in his book "Piece For A Jig-saw", Mr. Cramp produces startling evidence of a highly-tech- nical nature which shows how, following along purely engineering principles as a result of analyses of hundreds of reported saucer-sightings, with accomp- anying detail of manoeuvre and flight patterns, he arrives at the ideal form, in all respects, for a visit- ing "saucer". The saucer he finally produces, after progressive line-drawings and photographs by the author, is the Adamski scout-craft. In his concluding chapter, not only does the author quote details of engineering data provided by Adam- ski in his controversial books, but Mr. Cramp con- fesses that, until the time of writing this last chapter, he had not yet read completely Adamski's "Inside The Space Ships"! Realising perhaps certain read- ers' scepticism about this belated admission, Mr. Cramp goes on to describe points outlined in that book concerning Adamski's alleged trips in the scout-craft, whereby his (Cramp's) own scientifically arrived-at data receives startling corroboration! "At this juncture I can almost hear many an Adam- ski sceptic breathing a sigh of incredulity, hardly able to believe that I should dare to include such material in a semi-technical work of this nature." Unquote. With many detailed international sighting reports analysed scientifically, with his own photographed experiments showing the intensive study he has made of all aspects of "saucer" manoeuvre and flight, and accompanied by scores of finely-executed line-draw- ings, Leonard Cramp provides food for thought for all those of an open mind. Here, biased or un-biased as we may seem, we
the principles involved in weight-distri- bution and surface manipulation, i.e. expert engineers producing the revolutionary Hovercraft. "Some of my readers will have been ahead of me in these past assessments and no doubt will have anticipated my next intention. Yet others will be a trifle impatient that the following correlation should be made. But I must stress that science is not to be biased, science is fact, and I try very hard to leave it as it is. Therefore I am sincerely hopeful that the reader will be, too. I have purposely chosen the following title for the evidence which I hope may help shed some truer light on one who may be a very maligned man." UNQUOTE. Yes, the "very maligned man" is George Adamski. 12 years ago Leonard G. Cramp produced the orthographic projections which showed Stephen Darbishire's "Coniston" saucer, as photo- graphed by the author, was identical in shape and proportion to Adamski's classic "scout-craft". Today, in his book "Piece For A Jig-saw", Mr. Cramp produces startling evidence of a highly-tech- nical nature which shows how, following along purely engineering principles as a result of analyses of hundreds of reported saucer-sightings, with accomp- anying detail of manoeuvre and flight patterns, he arrives at the ideal form, in all respects, for a visit- ing "saucer". The saucer he finally produces, after progressive line-drawings and photographs by the author, is the Adamski scout-craft. In his concluding chapter, not only does the author quote details of engineering data provided by Adam- ski in his controversial books, but Mr. Cramp con- fesses that, until the time of writing this last chapter, he had not yet read completely Adamski's "Inside The Space Ships"! Realising perhaps certain read- ers' scepticism about this belated admission, Mr. Cramp goes on to describe points outlined in that book concerning Adamski's alleged trips in the scout-craft, whereby his (Cramp's) own scientifically arrived-at data receives startling corroboration! "At this juncture I can almost hear many an Adam- ski sceptic breathing a sigh of incredulity, hardly able to believe that I should dare to include such material in a semi-technical work of this nature." Unquote. With many detailed international sighting reports analysed scientifically, with his own photographed experiments showing the intensive study he has made of all aspects of "saucer" manoeuvre and flight, and accompanied by scores of finely-executed line-draw- ings, Leonard Cramp provides food for thought for all those of an open mind. Here, biased or un-biased as we may seem, we
-
편향된 UFO 연구자들에게 "우주선 내부" 이후 최고의 비행접시 기여 중 하나이다! 저자가 편향되지 않았다는 것은 조지 아담스키에 대한 내용이 아닌 이 책의 360페이지를 통해 증명될 수 있다. 일부 UFO 연구자 회의론자들이 이 훌륭한 책을 읽는 것을 이제는 삼가지 않기를 바라는 마음으로, 레너드 G. 크램프 자신의 요약 발췌문으로 결론을 맺고자 한다. "이 가장 수수께끼 같은 비행접시 접촉 이야기 주변의 혼란과 그림자 속에서 한두 가지, 그러나 매우 중요한 사실들이 드러난다. (a) 아담스키 유형의 비행접시는 UFO 보고서에서 드물지 않다. (b) 순전히 공학적인 관점에서 '정찰선'의 구성은 중력 추진 이론에 필요한 기능을 구현할 수 있는 최상의 전반적인 타협점을 제공한다. (c) 아담스키의 비행접시 내부 묘사는 이론과 모순되지 않으며, 오히려 이론이 그것을 뒷받침하는 것으로 보인다. (d) 따라서 이러한 근거만으로도 나는 그의 경험의 첫 부분을 사실로 받아들이는 경향이 있으며, 내 의견으로는 그의 후속 주장들에서 나타나는 어떠한 불일치도 이전 결론들을 무효화하기에는 불충분하다."
iased UFO researchers one of the best flying saucer contributions since "Inside The Space Ships"! That the author is not biased can be witnessed by the 360 pages of this book which are not about George Adamski. In expressing the hope that certain UFOlogist sceptics will not now refrain from pursuing reading this excellent book, we would like to conclude with an excerpt from the summing-up by Leo- nard G. Cramp himself. "Out of the confusion and the shadow surrounding this most enigmatic of flying saucer contact stories, emerges one or two, but nevertheless very important facts. (a) Adamski type saucers are not uncommon among UFO reports. (b) On purely engineering grounds the configurat- ion of the "scout ship" offers the best all- round compromise which would embody the functions required by the gravitational propul- sion theory. (c) Adamski's description of inside a saucer is not inconsistent with the theory, on the cont- rary, theory seems to support it. (d) Thus on these grounds alone I for one feel inclined to accept the first part of his exper- ience as fact, and in my opinion any incons- istencies which appear in his subsequent claims are insufficient to invalidate the prev- ious conclusions."
iased UFO researchers one of the best flying saucer contributions since "Inside The Space Ships"! That the author is not biased can be witnessed by the 360 pages of this book which are not about George Adamski. In expressing the hope that certain UFOlogist sceptics will not now refrain from pursuing reading this excellent book, we would like to conclude with an excerpt from the summing-up by Leo- nard G. Cramp himself. "Out of the confusion and the shadow surrounding this most enigmatic of flying saucer contact stories, emerges one or two, but nevertheless very important facts. (a) Adamski type saucers are not uncommon among UFO reports. (b) On purely engineering grounds the configurat- ion of the "scout ship" offers the best all- round compromise which would embody the functions required by the gravitational propul- sion theory. (c) Adamski's description of inside a saucer is not inconsistent with the theory, on the cont- rary, theory seems to support it. (d) Thus on these grounds alone I for one feel inclined to accept the first part of his exper- ience as fact, and in my opinion any incons- istencies which appear in his subsequent claims are insufficient to invalidate the prev- ious conclusions."
-
소머튼 출판사, 카우스, 와이트 섬.
SOMERTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, COWES, ISLE OF WIGHT.
SOMERTON PUBLISHING COMPANY, COWES, ISLE OF WIGHT.
-
기타
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
-
맑고 푸른 하늘에서 H. C. 피터슨 소령. 우리 모두는 지난 수백 년 동안 하늘에서 떨어졌다고 보고된 물체들에 대한 이야기를 알고 있다. 그리고 종종 맑고 구름 없는 하늘에서 떨어졌다. 과학자들과 다른 전문가들은 그러한 "낙하"를 운석, 유성, 또는 요즘에는 비행, 원자력 실험 등과 관련된 것으로 설명하려고 노력해 왔다. 프랑스인 루이 파우엘스와 자크 베르지에의 책 "마법사들의 아침" 1권에는 그러한 비범한 것들의 낙하에 대한 40,000개의 기록이 언급되어 있다. 우리가 운석과 얼음이라는 두 가지 종류의 물체에만 관심을 기울인다면, 우리는 과학과 다양한 다른 전문가 소스들이 그들의 결론에 대해 상당히 확신하는 영역에 있음을 알게 된다. 운석은 해체된 혜성과 행성, 또는 크고 작은 소행성에서 유래한다. 얼음은 비행기에서 나오는데, 외부에서 형성되거나 화장실에서 나온다.
Out of the clear, blue sky by MAJOR H. C. PETERSEN. WE ALL KNOW of accounts of objects which, during the past couple of hundred years, have been reported as falling down from the sky - and, often enough, from a clear, cloudless sky. Scientists and other experts have sought to ex- plain such "falls" as meteorites, meteors, or now- adays - as something in connection with flying, ato- mic tests or the like. In the book "Le Matin des Magiciens", by the Frenchmen, Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier, vol- ume One gives a reference to 40,000 notations of falls of such extraordinary things. If we concern ourselves solely with two groups of objects - meteorites and ice - then we find ourselves in an area where science and various other expert sources are quite positive in their conclusions. Meteoric stones originate from comets and planets which have disintegrated, or from larger or smaller asteroids. The ice comes from airplanes - either formed outwardly or from the toilet.
Out of the clear, blue sky by MAJOR H. C. PETERSEN. WE ALL KNOW of accounts of objects which, during the past couple of hundred years, have been reported as falling down from the sky - and, often enough, from a clear, cloudless sky. Scientists and other experts have sought to ex- plain such "falls" as meteorites, meteors, or now- adays - as something in connection with flying, ato- mic tests or the like. In the book "Le Matin des Magiciens", by the Frenchmen, Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier, vol- ume One gives a reference to 40,000 notations of falls of such extraordinary things. If we concern ourselves solely with two groups of objects - meteorites and ice - then we find ourselves in an area where science and various other expert sources are quite positive in their conclusions. Meteoric stones originate from comets and planets which have disintegrated, or from larger or smaller asteroids. The ice comes from airplanes - either formed outwardly or from the toilet.